Triumph of Arbitrators’ discretion to award pre-reference interest, Court cannot interfere!

Overview:

Supreme Court upholds party autonomy and the discretion of the Arbitrator to grant pre-reference interest. The power of the Arbitrator to award pre-reference and pendente lite interest cannot be restricted when the agreement is silent on whether interest can be awarded or does not contain a specific term that prohibits the same.

Technical Details: 

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Act”) sanctifies party autonomy and restricts the power to grant pre-reference and pendente lite interest the moment the agreement bars payment of interest. However, in absence of any specific bar, award for interest is within the domain of the Arbitrator under Section 31(7) of the Act. The Supreme Court thus ousted the jurisdiction of the Court under Sections 34 or 37 of the Act to interfere with the power of the Arbitrator to grant pre reference interest.

JC takeaway:

Arbitrators have discretion to grant pre reference interest unless specifically prohibited by the parties under the Agreement.

For further details, please see:  

Pam Developments Private Limited vs The State of West Bengal & Anr.pdf

For any queries/clarifications, please feel free to ping us and we will be happy to chat:

Similar Articles

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Explore

DISCLAIMER

The Bar Council of India prohibits advocates from soliciting work or advertising. By clicking ‘AGREE’ below, the user acknowledges that no solicitation has been made, and this website serves as a resource for general information about Juris Corp at the user’s own risk. The information provided here neither constitutes legal advice nor creates a lawyer-client relationship. The links provided are not endorsements by Juris Corp, and Juris Corp is not responsible for any linked content. Users are advised to seek independent legal advice for any legal issues.